hbo\'s \'chernobyl\' is getting mixed reviews from those who should know — the nuclear disaster\'s survivors

CHERNOBYL —
Commentators and viewers on both sides of the Atlantic are cheering for Nobel, a dramatic event surrounding the world\'s worst nuclear accident --
But the response from some survivors is not that strong. tinted.
Sergii Parashyn, then chairman of the Party committee at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, said HBO\'s mini
A series of films screened in the United States and Britain this spring depicts the initial doubts about the scale of the disaster.
\"It was not until dawn that I understood what had happened, until I saw with my own eyes that everything had been destroyed, and he told reporters in the command cabin that he used as the center of the crisis after the explosion on April 26, 1986.
The Soviet Union\'s fourth reactor in northern Kiev exploded in a bad safety test, releasing more radiation to the Earth\'s atmosphere than anyone else
Events have been created in history.
The accident killed 31 people in a few weeks and forced tens of thousands to flee.
Final number of radiation deaths
Cancer and other related diseases are controversial, and the World Health Organization estimates that there are thousands of diseases.
The series accused the Soviet Union of being too bureaucratic and confidential, and Parashyn said it described the way factory workers were defective, especially management.
British actor Paul Litt, who explains Anatoly diatlov, deputy chief engineer at Chernobyl, as tyrannical and arrogant, said, \"the behavior towards people is not as described in the show.
\"He is very strict, yes, everyone obeys him without any doubt . . . . . . But he\'s fair.
\"Parashyn, who was appointed director of the plant from 1994 to 1998, later served as chief of 30 km (19 mile)
Viktor Bryukhanov, who was then in charge, said the restricted area surrounding it was also described as inaccurate.
\"Bryukhanov is a calm, calm, intelligent person who has never denied his responsibility,\" he said . \".
This view was supported by Oleksiy Breus, senior engineer at reactor 4 in 1986, who arrived at 8: 00. m.
Shift on April 26.
Breus insisted: \"It seems that the workers in the factory are afraid of everything . . . . . . This does not reflect reality . \".
However, he praised the portrayal of Chernobyl as a global disaster rather than a regional one. At 9.
The 6/10 IMDb website has the highest-rated TV series ever, which has also led to a surge in visitors to the factory and the nearby ghost city Pripyat.
Tour guide Sergii Myrnyi believes that the show screened the last episode in June 3, describing the events of 1986 as a tragedy is wrong, calling \"Chernobyl\" a story of global learning . . . . . . And finally called it the story of victory.
Craig Masin, its creator, said it was sincere to deviate from the historical record.
\"In terms of historical accuracy, there is a difference between the perfect way of doing things and the perfect way of doing things, so that people will see it and appreciate the important things.
At least in this form, you can\'t do both, \"he said in an interview with Vice magazine this month.
The Chernobyl tour invited Parashyn, Breus and Myrnyi to the official launch of the agency\'s new tour, which will take visitors to the sites described in the series. —
Works by Mathias Williams;