Warning: How Jennifer Aniston's 'no-scapel facelift' puts you at risk of looking OLDER - best face lift device

It's not hard to see its appeal: a tighter, firmer Chin, a younger --
Look into the eyes and lift the young cheeks-none of this requires a single injection, let alone under the surgeon's operating knife.
Including celebrity supporters of all time.
Jennifer Aniston, a 48-year-old young actress, was no surprise.
Thousands of women in the UK have been treated for invasive "cosmetic surgery.
This treatment is carried out by a device that issues a "microfocus ultrasound", similar to the one used during a pregnant woman's scan, with the effect of lifting and tightening the skin, provided by a beauty doctor in the UK.
But an email from the Sunday survey revealed a doctor's concern about possible complications after the event, with some patients claiming the process made them look older.
A well-known cosmetic doctor claimed that the treatment could "accelerate the aging process", while a woman told this newspaper that she was "over-aging" after receiving treatment with Ultherapy ".
Ulthera, a manufacturer owned by German pharmaceutical giant Merz, now faces lawsuits from many unhappy patients.
It is alleged that the patient's cheeks and eyes were hollowed out due to treatment, the volume of the face was lost, and the skin was loose and thinner.
In legal documents, counsel claims that when used on the face, such treatment can result in "serious and permanent physical injury" and "loss of fat, deformity, eye damage" and"
One patient even said her blindness was related to surgery.
Merz has denied all these allegations. Florida-
Dr. Thomas Tzikas, the surgeon, told this newspaper that he had seen eight patients claiming complications following treatment with Ultherapy, and that some patients needed surgery to solve the problem.
He said: "These women in their 40 s have told me that their skin is much looser and softer than before.
They can stretch and pull the skin, while they seem to have more resistance in the year before they tighten the skin, and the volume will decrease.
"It's devastating because it's like accelerating the aging process.
This seems irreversible.
When asked why some women are satisfied with treatment, while others have complications, he added: "These women are all about the same age, usually in their 40 s to 50 s.
Combined with Ulthera treatment, a reduction in estrogen and other hormones may lead to a significant difference in facial elasticity.
According to Merz, more than 800,000 Ultherapy treatments have been performed worldwide since its launch in 2009, of which 40,000 are in the UK.
Body tissue after treatment
The repair process stimulates the production of new collagen and elastic proteins [proteins that naturally exist in the skin, giving it a hardness and structure that dissipated over age], the site explained the effect of lifting and tightening.
Ultherapy has proved to be effective and safe in many studies.
According to the data, patients may suffer "short discomfort" during the operation, and adverse events are listed as "short red spots [redness], edema [swelling] and occasional blue wounds"
Uncommon events include muscle weakness, brief numbness, and weals-a raised red skin area-which is allegedly caused by poor treatment techniques.
None of the literature available observed volume loss or skin relaxation as possible side effects.
Dr. Tzikas claimed: "We have seen fat loss [on the face], which seems to be caused by treatment in some women.
This loss may be the cause of the aging effect.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the US medical watchdog, has approved Ultherapy for specific areas of the face: Eyebrows, under the chin, neck, and dislocation.
But Dr. Tzikas has seen many patients, and some of the patients who took legal action claim that they were treated around the cheeks and cheekbones.
So is this treatment wrong?
If so, is that the reason for the devastating impact?
Notably, when Merz sought FDA approval to list Ultherapy in 2012 for "full", the request was considered "unacceptable due to the lack of evidence on such use
Legal documents obtained by The Post on Sunday said the company was desperate to sell the treatment, and Merz denied the allegations.
At present, there is a saying on its website: "ultherapy can help you get a fresher, younger look from your eyebrows to your chest!
An illustration of a treated facial area appears to include cheeks, cheekbones, and the surroundings of the temples.
There was "full face" before"and-after photos.
In a case against Ulthera on behalf of three American patients, personal injury expert Harman Law said: "merz made a request to the FDA, which denies this and approves the sale of Ultherapy for the face. . . Merz, despite the systematic and deliberate sale of Ultherapy for the entire face. . . Despite practical knowledge of Ultherapy's risk of eye and facial injuries.
Merz denied the allegations, saying they were "worthless" and only admitted that an application had been made to the FDA in an attempt to extend the use to "front and neck ".
A spokesman added: "We do not, nor do we claim, that the FDA approves full face lifting or otherwise closes --
The label [unapproved] claims . . . . . . But doctors do not limit the treatment of the whole face.
This treatment will be considered "unfair"
Label '-common practice of using a drug or treatment outside the terms of the license.
While doctors can legally use their discretion to manage a drug or treatment
If such behavior is considered to be in the best interests of the patient and there is sufficient evidence that it is beneficial, it is prohibited for pharmaceutical companies to encourage such behavior.
"We do not advocate, we do not encourage
Labels use our equipment or any of our products.
Theresa Baldwin, 51, is from Arizona and claims to be shocked by the results of her Ultherapy treatment she received in 2015, so much so that she canceled her wedding.
"I started to see some obvious signs of aging and went to a clinic where I recommended a lot of clients in my job as a beauty therapist," she said . ".
She received two separate treatments at a total cost of £ 1,450.
But three months after the second treatment, Theresa did not see any positive results, but noticed a deterioration in the texture of her skin.
She said, I seem to be old overnight.
"I have a hollow, empty look of anorexia, and my skin is paper --thin.
The staff told me to stop losing weight when my face became too thin-but I actually added 5 lbs.
Theresa returned to the clinic, but claimed that the staff refused to show her the photos they had taken in advance, which would prove the difference in her skin and only offered to receive another treatment she had refused.
Sunday's mail has been in contact with several other women reporting similar issues, although they are unable to speak publicly due to legal proceedings.
Harman Law in Atlanta filed a complaint against Merz on behalf of five women.
These include "severe and permanent physical injuries including fat atrophy, eye protrusion, muscle degeneration, scars, nerve damage, and visual loss ".
It claims that the device is "defective in design because its design is to provide focused ultrasound energy in a way that cannot be safely used on the face" and that the warnings provided by the ulthera System are defective, because Merz does not adequately warn about the risk of fat loss, deformity, eye damage, nerve damage, muscle damage, and other serious permanent damage.
A woman in California is also taking legal action against plastic surgeons and Ulthera Inc. after she was treated at a meeting in 2015.
Allegedly, her right eye lost almost all sight due to this mistake
Destroy the directional ultrasonic energy of [her] lens.
She claimed that cataract surgery did not restore vision.
Merz responded: "The company denied Ultherapy treatment in any field that could cause ultrasonic energy to be delivered to the eye crystal, and denied that any so-called cataract or vision problems were caused by
Merz also claimed that her vision had been restored through surgery.
It acknowledges that there has been a product liability lawsuit involving Ultherapy filed by "a small number of individual plaintiffs", and that the company "denies that there is merit ".
Ultherapy is a safe product that can provide good results, a spokesman said.
We estimate that there are already more than a million treatments around the world and believe that the vast majority of patients are satisfied with their treatment.
Ultherapy has conducted research in clinical trials and has been submitted and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
Major plastic surgeons and cosmetic dermatologists studied this treatment and the results were published in dozens of articles in the prestigious medical journal.
As far as we know, in any clinical trial conducted by Merz, there were no reports of fat loss, and journal articles did not report specific events of fat loss.
Patients and doctors are generally satisfied with the effectiveness and safety of this treatment.
In addition to saying that we deny the allegations and firmly believe in the safety and effectiveness of our products, we cannot comment further on the ongoing proceedings.
Dr. Rian Maercks, a plastic surgeon in Miami, claims that up to 10 women have complained about Ultherapy every month for the past two years.
He said that the problems reported by many women may be due to the implementation of the procedure by practitioners who do not have proper qualifications and experience or misuse.
He warned: "I think it would be helpful to use this technique only below the chin.
However, Alex Karidis at the Karidis Clinic in London has used Ultherapy for hundreds of patients without any problems.
All treatments are at risk, he said.
Botox causes sagging and the filling causes a reaction.
This does not mean that they are bad.
He added: "I am happy with Ultherapy.
In fact, my wife has just done this for the second time.