U.S. government officially accuses Russia of hacking campaign to interfere with elections - what's the best electric toothbrush 2016

On Friday, the Obama administration officially accused Russia of trying to interfere in 2016 elections, including the invasion of computers from the Democratic National Committee and other political organizations.
The office of the national intelligence director and the Department of Homeland Security issued a condemnation, at the same time, the pressure from within the government and some lawmakers is growing, asking them to publicly name Moscow, and be responsible for acts that apparently aim to create discord in the election. “The U. S.
The intelligence community believes the Russian government has recently compromised on e-commerce. mails from U. S.
Individuals and institutions including the United StatesS.
A joint statement from the two agencies said. “. . .
The theft and disclosure is to interfere with the United States. S.
Election process.
Fingers of the public
Senior members of the Democratic and Republican parties welcomed this and also said they now expect the government to take action to punish the Kremlin as part of a move to stop hackers from acting further.
"Today is only the first step," Sen said . "Ben Sasse (R-Neb.
), Member of the Homeland Security Committee.
"Russia must face serious consequences.
Moscow has planned these attacks because Russian President Vladimir Putin believes
Style aggression is worth it.
The United States must subvert Putin's views through strong diplomatic, political, cyber and economic responses.
The White House has been considering possible responses such as economic sanctions, but has yet to make formal proposals to the president.
The Democratic National Committee publicly disclosed the invasion on June, saying its investigation determined that Russian government hackers were behind the invasion.
Followed by a major leak of the DNC email, some were so embarrassed that they forced the DNC chair's representative to resign.
Debbie Wassman Schulz.
), On the eve of the Democratic National Convention.
The government also accused Moscow of hacking into the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which later leaked the private email address and mobile phone number of Democratic lawmakers.
Then there were other leaks of materials hacked.
This digitally processed material has appeared on websites such as Washington leaks and WikiLeaks.
These include private emails from former Secretary of State Powell and aides to former Secretary of State and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
An online character who claims to be Guccifer 2.
0 has claimed responsibility for posting materials.
These sites and roles "are consistent with the Russian approach and motivation"
"Work directly," the joint statement said . ". “. . .
We believe that, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, only senior Russian officials
Most officials can authorize these activities.
The Kremlin dismissed the government's charges on Friday.
"It's kind of nonsense," said Dmitry Peskov, Putin's press secretary . ".
"Putin's website is attacked by thousands of hackers every day.
Many of these attacks date back to the United States. S. territory.
It's not that we blame the White House or Langley for doing this every time.
"Hours after the government called on Russia, WikiLeaks released about 2,000 emails hacked into Clinton's campaign president John Podesta's personal Gmail inbox.
Among them were excerpts from Clinton's remarks to the Wall Street bank, which she refused to make public.
She said in one of the articles that Wall Street knows best how to regulate.
The event did not recognize the authenticity of the extract.
The FBI did not immediately send any news about whether the Russians were behind the alleged hackers.
The Obama administration noted that attempts to intervene in other countries' political processes were not new to Moscow.
It noted that Russian hackers used hackers and other technologies to influence public opinion in Europe and Eurasia.
After a key
For example, in the revolutionary presidential election of Ukraine in 2014, a digital attack almost paralyzed the website of the country's Central Electoral Commission.
For weeks, intelligence has believed that hackers related to Russian spy agencies are behind DNC hackers.
Senior officials at the Department of Justice and Homeland Security have urged the White House to make allegations public.
But some government officials are concerned that such statements appear to politicize the issue a few weeks before the election.
They are also concerned about the Kremlin's reaction and the inadvertent disclosure of sensitive sources and methods of intelligence.
"Is it in our interest to take action? ” Lisa O.
Monaco, Obama's counter-terrorism and homeland security adviser, said at the Washington Post cyber security summit on Thursday.
"The main guidance and overall focus of these discussions is: what is in America's national security interest?
This is the Polaris of the discussion.
"In recent weeks, senior government officials have begun to suggest that there may be public ownership.
"We know that Russia is a bad role in cyberspace, as China and Iran did, Monaco said last month at the cyber security conference at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
"When you do a malicious cyber attack, no one should think there is a free pass --activity.
Assistant Attorney General John Karin said in the same incident that information to countries such as Russia was trying to interfere with the United StatesS.
The election is, "you can and will be held accountable.
With the public naming of Moscow, the government has now officially announced all its major countries
National enemies of cyberspace: China, Iran, North Korea and Russia.
But of the four countries, Russia is the only government that has not taken deterrent measures.
The government has a range of options, including economic sanctions against malicious cyber attacks.
Activity, a new tool created by the president that has not yet been used.
The Justice Department may sue for hacking.
The National Security Agency can take covert actions in cyberspace to signal to the Kremlin.
Or the State Department can decide to expel Russian diplomats.
Jason Healey, senior scholar in network research
Columbia University's question says the Pentagon's Cyber Command should disrupt Russian hacking.
"Follow their command and control," he said . "
The key word here is "counter-attack ". ”Rep. Adam B.
Senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, California HIFF, urged the government to work with European allies to develop a "consistent" response, whether it be economic sanctions or other measures.
"The best way to fight back is real international efforts to let Russians know that this latest form of network will pay the price," said Shiff.
Aggression against others
David Filipov contributed to the report.