Letters - best at home skin care devices

Read Jay Belsky and have a bad time with others.
As the subject of your cover story, let me point out more, although NICHD's study of early childhood care is not a randomized controlled trial, but rather an observational study of problems with causal inference, I have always been surprised that my collaborators or many journalists have hardly ever raised the findings of reporting this very identical observational study--
There are many others. -
Link the quality of good child care with the promotion of child development.
In other words, when there are disturbing news reports about child care, a keen, skeptical mind always seems rich, but, when these news are comforting, the same people will enter the cheerleading mode.
When researchers find a positive correlation between quality of care and child development and make causal inferences based on these non-experimental data such as "This suggests that we need better quality care," by the way, I also strongly believe that all findings from field studies are considered uncertain and seem fair
A thoughtful journalist like MS
Whenever there is a child, Sweni severely punishes investigators.
Nursing data is reported in seemingly causal terms, or something else has happened here.
I doubt the latter because whenever the NICHD Research Report is high
High quality care seems to be good for children, a seemingly thoughtful journalist like MS.
Winnie is almost nowhere to find. Ms. Sweeney's high-
I can only guess that it has nothing to do with the rights and errors that explain social science data, and nothing to do with what these data imply.
This leads to the well-
Hone the practice of shooting the messenger when the news is bad, but hug him/her when you like.
In my opinion, this is not an objective report, but a pure and simple politics.
But maybe it's okay for the salon.
It must make some readers feel good! . --
Jay Belsky, director of research on children, family and social issues, birkbeck College, University of London.
Sharon, thank you for posting the first one, and of course the most important one
Deep criticism of recent NICHD Research on the link between aggression and daycare.
The controversy surrounding this finding is more about the lessons of media manipulation than about how professional social science research translates into public policy.
Of course, the study of social science is a long and complicated process.
Acceptable procedures in medical research are unethical in social science research.
Social scientists do have to rely on observation and relevance when conducting research, but carefully review and replicate research before accumulating enough evidence and making sense for these findings.
Having had the opportunity to review this study last week, I can tell you that while the difference between daycare children and home care children is statistically significant, the difference measured by the scale of aggression is actually small.
Also, in the competition for sound bites and big titles, a key factor is lost in the shuffle: the study labeled 17% more aggressive people still fall within the range of behaviors considered normal on the list of children's behaviors.
(15% is an approximate national norm for "external behavior" such as aggression.
) More problematic is the word aggression itself.
In the context of the study, the exact meaning of aggression or "external behavior" is defined as "self-confidence", "disobedience", "provocation" and "destructive ".
"It is certain that all of these are negative words, but one can argue that these words simply mean that the child is more autonomous, independent, and able to speak for himself.
However, there is no doubt that the most important criticism that one can make about the study, as Sweny has done, is that the findings are inconclusive.
It is too early to use these findings to inform individual practice, let alone public policy.
Unfortunately, the study was wrongly interpreted as a justification for a range of political views.
Everyone else except mom is taking care of the kids, which is not a problem.
The problem is low wages, high turnover, lack of training during the day
The care industry, which is a common factor in general day care in the United StatesS.
If one message can be obtained from this argument, that is, parents need all the help they can get, it is unnecessary and counter-productive to plunder their guilt, there are many ways to cultivate good children. --Fran Stott, Ph. D.
The child is the dean and vice president of the academic program.
Of course, nursing research reminds me of me. so-
Distant plans for parents
I have been looking forward to having a family with my husband once I finish my paper in two or three years.
I spent a few years, a lot of money on my higher education, and I also want to have a career while raising my children.
If I think Belsky's conclusion is correct (I don't know), would I choose to jeopardize their future by putting my children at risk of daycare?
I will choose not to have children.
When her husband goes out to work, Felice schlafite may be more than happy to stay at home and take care of her children, but I. . . oh, wait!
That's not what she did!
Instead, she chose to make the most of her half
Celebrity to ensure that other women complete all of the above without any creativity, intellectual expression or professional achievement.
Calling me a feminist (sneer in the dark), but when men live (and are limited, but at least socially valuable) professional life, women should live an extremely limited family life, in today's economy, how about supporting the family by just one salary, or staying a little longer --at-
Family Father, is not Belsky's choice for those who can manage a paid family. . .
Any caregiver other than the mother is considered a "day care ".
"Also, it's just a problem for those who have the ability to do it.
For millions of American mothers, work is not based on a desire for professional achievement;
It is necessary to put things on the table and shoes on the feet of her child.
No, I'm not saying to have a career in order to continue paying for the SUV, but to spend a summer in the vineyard-
Whether you believe it or not, America is not just made up of the rich and the middle class --class.
Still asking class questions makes me a Marxist instead of trying to return to an ideal fictional 50 s. era All-
American families, Belsky, Schlafly, and their peers need to recognize the reality facing American families in the 21 st century.
The working mother will stay so let's see what we can do to help them raise the good kids, OK? -
Tenley DiefenbachI, 40, thought, as a professional mother (I have a 2-and-a-half-year-
This age brings wisdom. -
Or at least understand-
My reaction to a different point of view.
Unfortunately, reading some of the comments in the letter about this article reminds me that my emotional skin is not as tough as I thought.
However, it is clear that the fact that my daughter is in the daycare center will solve the problem for her ---
According to some people.
Why mothers who work are often labeled "selfish" or "want to eat cake too", I will not label "stay"at-
A family mother of this valueladen comments.
If you can or want to stay at home-great.
If not, I chose it myself and obviously support that as well.
Although our different societies call it by other names, the children have been in daycare ---
"Servant" and "grandparents"-
Even their own equipment. -
Because of the ability
Good Health (read: parents, having to plough, milk or make clothes because they are in the best condition.
I suspect that any culture before the industrial age will be amused by our ability to argue about their daily normal lives.
Why not accept the life choices that others do not belong to you?
Unless you want to sue the custody of these poor unarmed children and suffer at the daycare center, accept the choice of their parents and let go.
Life is too short, whether you believe it or not, our love for children is like love for children --at-
Mom, I want to give them the best. --Eileen P.
Children in the competitive environment are more aggressive. They're cruel.
They seek more attention and talk in turn.
They are pushier.
Well, you know what that sounds like, the whole page turning about daycare damage sounds like it sounds like in my opinion, in an understanding resource (work, school funding, food, air, water) will be limited and no one will be free to pay attention to them.
It sounds like these children are already aware of what their parents refuse to admit: too many of them are cursed.
So day care makes Junior A computing-capable, aggressive drone.
Don't have children, don't have children if you can't afford them, and you won't have this problem either.
We need more human children on this rock.
It's like a fish needs a bicycle.
The children seem to understand this when they are very young, smart little animals.
I got so much gas from Jennifer Foote Sweeney that the government should do something about this frustrating news about daycare.
They are not children of the government.
Breeding is optional;
If you choose to do so, deal with the consequences yourself. --
Melanie fiorrit rarely gives the public a glimpse of the flaws of scientists as people and researchers.
What I am worried about is that many people will think that research is flawed.
As a PhD in clinical psychology at the University of California
Berkeley, I was taught several very important lessons about how to do research.
Nothing different from the important lessons children learn in childcare: 1) share 2) Don't bite, use your words 3) just because two things are adjacent to each other doesn't mean one thing causes another to happen (I. e.
Association is not causal ). --
M. Emily CooperA.
Department of Psychology-
What I am humorous about this argument is the reversal of logic.
According to the authors, the aggression observed in this study is good in the normal behavior of these children.
So there is no pathology.
It was observed that there was a correlation between daily attendance and normal aggression.
Humorously, this sentence is how wimpy baski is: he is timid in his view of normal.
In other words, if daycare enhances normal aggression, then this is a positive finding, which may be the reason for a positive correlation with learning.
But Belsky interprets more positive findings from daycare students as negative conclusions, which means he finds timidity to be a positive feature.
Someone kicked the sand on his face. --
Mike Matini wants to know, those who "cheered" on the reading of NICHD Research by baski and asked the mother to return to the friendlier --kirche-
The kitchen has really been considered as thoroughly as possible.
If mom goes home, there will definitely be less money in the family budget for bigger families, big gas
Fuel-consuming cars (Dick Cheney and his friends make a profit from the sale forever)
Increase the price of water pumps), reduce the consumption of luxury goods such as dvd, console, home computer. etc. etc.
(Not to mention a trip to the Disney World, stylish Gap children's clothing, toys fighting city, dinner and movies etc.
Maybe all professional mothers should go home for a few years.
And then we can hear her radical.
The right cadres complained about how "selfish" they were not maintaining our red, white and blue consumer economy by working outside to buy these goods ".
Or maybe the Republican right wing will support living wages, universal health benefits, etc, so it's easier for a family to stay --at-
Parents don't cut off the basics, let alone the "selfish" luxury goods.
Maybe so.
Maybe the monkey will fly out of my ass. --
Kerry read The Black wrong.
While I generally agree with some of the author's expectations for black people for white liberals, she seems to have hinted at something equally problematic ---
The other side of the equation must be prep school and Ivy-
The alliance educated black people.
She seems to go out of her way to say that she went to Harvard and Harvard Law School (although I believe she is proud to be able to attend both schools and she can simply mention universities and law schools ).
There is an intermediate area in Africa --
She thinks white liberals seem to expect Americans between the slum community and the upper class.
She seems to be part of the class group (Shaker heigts is a particularly wealthy community ).
A successful African
In this country where there is no "identity education", she seems eager to show off herself. --
The only thing Felicia left behind.
Berry didn't tell us to make her story complete is where and what Peter is doing now.
I have experienced many similar experiences in my life and I have learned two things.
First, it is the best revenge to live well. second, "there is no progress without struggle. "--Robert H.
Russell, III agrees with the author's assessment that positive black experiences are not rewarded as they deserve.
But many of the experiences she describes are not just black, but American.
Many of the ills that affect our society are the first to combat the ills of the poor in our society.
Illegal, broken family, child violence, drugs-
These may have hit black people in the first place, but they have spread to other areas.
These problems are caused by the broad socio-economic changes that affect all of us and must be dealt with by all of us.
Remember, black people are one of the first Americans to get here!
Some have something to do with our best (white) family! --
Carol PawlowskiI read Berry's article with great interest and reached an agreement to a large extent.
But I think she made a mistake.
Maybe small, maybe not.
She wrote: I saw the performance of this belief and visited black people who had achieved success in some fields of education or specialty, but it has never been heard of a white man describing this success as "selling out ".
"Most people I know support success, but I don't think it will make a person less real . "
"Even white people who are ridiculously fearful or contemptuous of black people seem to think that a shift to success is a step forward.
Think of it as a kind of sales.
They must find value in black culture. -
But they don't.
They were involved in the myth that black culture was about hard times and bad education, and didn't even romanticize it, thinking it was a good thing. --
Although I understand, most people agree with Ms.
Berry's work, I can't help but notice one thing that upset me: Despite her condemnation of the universal identity of black culture, believing that it was only a victim of white people, though, she also accused white people of imposing the victim's mentality on black people, implicitly accepting the phenomenon she condemned at the same time. I don't get it. --
If there is no message, Aaron LoutschI will designate Cecelie Berry as lucky.
She obviously benefited from some of the top education.
The academic level of our country-
Unlike most people of any race.
She also made a comprehensive statement on how to teach national literature in the late 1970 s, but there was no evidence that she went beyond her own experience.
In fact, those of us who teach literature outside of Shaker Heights and Harvard, in addition to "symbolic" black novels or a set of articles, include more.
Ask the young women I have taught
We covered a course from Early America (Felice Whitley) to the Harlem Renaissance, Ralph Ellison, Richard Wright, James Baldwin, Maya Eldridge Chefer, Malcolm X, and more poems cited in my memory.
I think her remarks are just as stereotyped as those she recalls.
I am a white teacher at a white private school. Go figure . . . --A.
Thank you, thank you, thank you for this article!
I am tired of the idea of white liberalism, I was born in a slum and separated from my twin brother, basketball.
I keep saying that if black people succeed tonight, white liberals will lose their jobs tomorrow.
I know how the writer feels.
As a black gay male, I am often used as an example of "acceptable black" by white liberals.
Drag from party to party like some gay Frederick Thomas, hoping to explain the "pain and anger" my "brothers" feel in the "hood" as if I knew
There is a perception problem for liberals.
They can see that white people are down, in, up-
Middle class and upper class.
But it's all about the "hood" and "Oh, we have to help them!
"I don't need their help. I've got a job!
For the record, they yell at you when you tell them this ---
More severe than any Republican. --