Federal judge won't block congressional subpoenas for Trump's bank records - where can i buy an oral irrigator

On Wednesday, a federal judge dismissed President Trump's efforts to block a congressional subpoena that asked the two banks to provide his financial records, within a week, the judge ruled for the second time in support of congressional efforts to obtain presidential records. Mr.
Trump, his children, and the Trump group sued to prevent Deutsche Bank and Capital One from complying with the subpoenas issued by the House Financial Services Committee and the House Intelligence Committee.
At a hearing in the Federal Court of Manhattan on Wednesday, the United StatesS.
District Judge Edgardo Ramos, standing on the Democratic side of Congress, refused to stop banks from complying with the subpoenas, saying they were "likely to be legal ".
"Hot News google Cloud outagemailing Connecticut momom beach gunfight protesters interrupted Harris during an hour of oral debate, and Patrick stroubridge, chief counsel for the presidential team, said, the summons went beyond the powers of Congress and was explicitly sought for exposure in order to "expose.
Ramos saw the argument as "unconvincing" and said that the summons had been issued for "legitimate legislative purposes", citing an-
Earlier this year, the House introduced a money laundering bill.
House chief counsel Douglas Neil said there was no basis for fear that the records would be leaked immediately if handed over to the committee.
He said lawmakers could eventually vote to make them public, but the congressional committee was "not just Willie-
They are willing to disclose the situation.
In a brief moment of indiscretion, Ramos asked in the letter, "leave room for Congress, how far can I go ? "?
The letter cited the Supreme Court's precedent that the summons clearly belonged to the congressional investigative authority, and Ramos replied, "So, what am I doing here ? "?
After a short break, Ramos read out his long decision on the bench.
He said that the powers of investigation in Congress are extensive, questioning [the role of the judiciary]Congress']motives.
Ramos rejected every request made by the presidential legal team, including a request to suspend his ruling.
Lawyers told Ramos that they would appeal the decision, a "safe bet ".
Lawyers at Deutsche Bank and First Capital attended the hearing on Wednesday but did not speak in court.
The two banks were named together.
Defendant in action
The decision was made two days after a federal judge in Washington, D. C. C.
Ruling by the House Supervisory Committee, which is seeking records from him
Trump's firm of long-term accountants
The judge in the case also refused to stop the commission's summons, saying that they and
Trump's lawyer quickly filed a notice of appeal. The back-to-
A victory in court could strengthen the argument of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that Democrats can look into the president without initiating an impeachment investigation.
Some Democratic lawmakers believe that impeachment investigations are necessary in order to obtain the records that many committees are seeking.
At a meeting of House Democrats on Wednesday
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Maxine Waters highlighted the committee's efforts to obtain Deutsche bank records.
"We must continue to do our work," Waters said, according to people familiar with the matter . ". Mr.
Trump has been a customer of Deutsche Bank for decades, and according to his 0. 13 billion financial disclosure forms, he owes Deutsche Bank at least $2019 through his various commercial entities.
Deutsche Bank has also been summoned by New York Attorney General James, who is investigating the president's business dealings.
The summons in the investigation sought records from Deutsche Bank and investor Bank in connection with the Trump Organization and Mr. Trump's four project financing
Trump tried to buy Buffalo Bills a few years ago but failed.
Rebecca Kaplan was involved.