Does the ANC still have full confidence in Zuma? - best toothbrush in the world

Since 2009, the Parliament has debated and vetoed six proposals that do not trust President Jacob Zuma.
This does not include DA's impeachment motion after a harsh constitutional court ruling against Zuma on April.
Last Thursday's attempt was also unlikely to be the last, as DA stubbornly continued to make the motion, leaving only the ANC to vote against it.
On the one hand, the audience turned their eyes and wanted to know how long DA broke the wall with a toothbrush;
On the other hand, more importantly, they asked the ANC to stick with its leaders for how long and he did nothing but damage the ANC brand.
Zuma is as disgusted as he is, and his supporters usually defend the president.
As expected, Zuma survived the opposition's efforts on Thursday to try to take him away from South Africa's top office.
A motion by DA for distrust of Zuma was rejected by an overwhelming majority of members of the National Assembly (214)
Only 126 voted in favor.
Despite the great factions of the non-state, despite the succession race, despite criticism and loud voices within the party, the voting pattern is more or less the same: 113,201 in March, 221;
This year, EFF abstained, with 99 people supporting it and 225 opposing it.
But DA has been filing these bills, hoping that at least more than 50 ANC members will become rogue and vote with them.
As Themba Godi said, "This has become a political project for DA ".
The party also understands these motions and gives it and the rest of the opposition a valid national platform, attacking Zuma in the form of the National Assembly-and to some extent the ANC-would like the debate to be on the way to brand condoms.
In fact, in the latest round, the opposition has launched a fight against the ANC.
In his speech, Mmusi Maimane continued to call on the ANC judges to put South Africa first.
James selfi is sharper: "It's a debate about whether Jacob Zuma is fit to serve as president, but it's also about how the ANC elected him and how the ANC protected him, at the same time, there is overwhelming evidence that he is not suitable for the office, and the ANC continues to support him ".
Mangosuthu Buthelezi, leader of the Inkatha Liberal Party, tried the emotional blackmail route, saying that the ANC's refusal to expel Zuma was an "unimaginable stubborn act" a movement that already existed in 104 has collapsed, it is taking South Africa away for the benefit of one person ".
EFF called it the ANC's "tactical error ".
"Because we believe that the liberation movement itself should act against Jacob Zuma on its own conscience, who has given up his responsibility as the leader of our country and has given it to a family, "Freud of Shivambu EFF. Ditto!
It's interesting who the ANC chose to defend Zuma.
The party chose to allocate 30 minutes between the two members instead of the three members that were normally dispatched before.
First of all, the Minister of Water and Health, Nomvula Mokonyane, a well-known supporter of Zuma, who could not even vote because she was not a member of parliament.
Mokonyane talked about a wonderful game.
She first saw the motion as a "phantom" to disguise the nature and nature of opposition politics and their pursuit of power through means other than the ballot box.
She claims that the elite wants to launch a long-term attack on Zuma, attacking speculation and unfounded emotions that have no factual basis in law and reality.
Mokonyane claims that this is to keep most people out of access to land and to remain on-the-sidelines in an economy dominated by a handful of elites opposed to transformation.
She argues that Zuma, after all, appointed Thuli Madonsela as a public protector, appointed the board of inquiry he had considered its proposal, and signed 69 announcements authorizing the special investigation unit to investigate
Finally, Mokonyane said to Zuma while he was away: "The world will never appreciate that you have done countless good things, but will criticize you for doing something wrong.
Don't be discouraged.
Always above all laughter and criticism.
But she chose the sentence of Nelson Mandela, which really sums up the position of Zuma's defense lawyer: "I am not a saint, unless you consider a Saint a sinner who is constantly trying.
It is said that Zuma will stay and he will continue to work hard.
Does this mean that the ANC has confidence in Zuma?
It is strange that the ANC, in previous debates trying to amend the opposition's motion of distrust to a motion of full confidence in Zuma, did not do so this time.