clean energy or cheap energy? we can have both - household electrical appliances

Is Reg PlattCLEAN still cheap?
This is increasingly becoming the choice for energy consumers.
The decision looks simple.
Addressing carbon pollution is considered an unaffordable luxury as bills rise relentlessly. It's not with the colon.
The energy is clean and cheap.
The so-called conflict between cheap energy and clean energy is the main battleground in Europe.
On September 2013, nine of Europe's largest utilities warned that the expansion of renewable energy, backed by "excessive subsidies", was endangering the continent's energy security.
In Germany, some subsidies supporting the country's ambitious renewable energy program will be cut due to cost concerns.
In Britain, the issue was pushed to the top of the political agenda last year when opposition leader Ed Miliband promised to freeze the energy bill for 15 months if elected in 2015.
As next year's general election approaches, politicians from all parties are now focusing on the issue.
Their focus on energy costs is not surprising because, as the survey shows, voters have noticed that bills are rising.
In 2003, the average household expenditure in Britain was 1.
8% of its gas and electricity revenues.
Rose to 3 last year. 1 per cent.
Between 2004 and 2011, the average annual energy bill for households in the UK has risen by 360 to 970.
The main reason for the soaring price is the rising wholesale cost of natural gas;
They are responsible for the rise of 2004.
Clean energy policies accounted for only 10 per cent of growth.
But this does not prevent the green policy from taking responsibility.
For example, Prime Minister David Cameron has reportedly said recently that he wants to "get rid of the green garbage on the energy bill" to lower it.
After that, his government has scaled back a policy to help people improve energy efficiency in their homes.
The problem will only get worse.
Eliminate carbon pollution by replacing coal and natural gas with low carbon
Carbon energy such as wind farms and nuclear power plants is expensive.
By £ 2020, the UK bill payer will pay £ 7.
6 billion of "green taxes" per year will be added to their gas and electricity bills to subsidize low
Carbon power generation.
UK bill payers will pay £ 7 before £ 2020.
Increased green taxes by 6 billion per year on energy bills, a figure that will increase significantly to 2020
The carbon generator went online.
It is not clear that bill payers will accept the payment of these escalating fees.
We obviously need a new, lower one.
If consumers want to stick to it, the cost route of clean energy.
The answer is to invest more money and effort in reducing and managing consumer energy needs.
To understand why this is the case, Europe can seek the first approach in the United States.
One overriding reason for reducing demand is that if less energy is used, less carbon will be released into the atmosphere.
After all, the cleanest energy source is the unused one.
But it is the "double bonus" that consumers receive from using less energy that makes this approach so appealing.
First of all, if consumers use less energy, they not only pollute less, but also pay lower bills.
Second, if consumers use less energy in large quantities, less low
Carbon power stations need to be built, which means less subsidy costs must be passed on to the bill.
California has proven this by considering these double benefits in the design of its energy policy.
The benefits can be substantial.
Research from my organization's Institute of Public Policy shows that if British consumers buy high
By 2030, less efficient appliances
The cost of carbon subsidies will fall by 1 pound.
Today's price is 8 billion a year.
At the same time, lower energy use will lead to a drop of £ 2 billion per year in their total bills.
Another way to get clean energy while reducing electricity costs is to better manage power demand.
At some point in the day, electricity usage peaks, such as on the night when people come home from work to watch TV.
During this period, the most expensive source of power generation began to be used, which increased the cost of all other power generation at that time.
This means that the peak of demand increases the cost of bills.
One estimate is that in the United States, there is up to four days of peak demand from the total cost of providing electricity a year.
To limit the cost of peak demand, some US utilities now pay customers to not use energy at the same time as others.
Similar to reducing demand, this method produces a double dividend & colon;
Consumers have reduced their energy costs and have benefited from the incentives offered.
This new approach is possible thanks to new technologies.
For example, Nest, in Palo Alto, California, provides a service to automatically turn off air conditioning so that its owners can benefit from the rewards.
Google acquired Nest in dollars; 3.
January 20 billion.
We can look forward to seeing more technological innovation in this area.
Therefore, it is clear that there is no need to sacrifice clean energy policies on the altar of affordability.
Reducing and better managing demand can reduce bills and make the transition to clean energy more affordable.
European policy
This method should be supported by the manufacturer.
No one says it's free to deal with climate change.
But reducing demand and better managing demand is the cleanest and cheapest energy method that we should make the most.